Two Quebec males accused of fathering a whole bunch of children have been banned from donating sperm within the province whereas a courtroom case in opposition to them unfolds.
Justice Simon Chamberland granted an interlocutory injunction Wednesday in opposition to Philippe Normand and his son, Dominik Seelos.
Normand and Seelos have been accused of fathering a whole bunch of children by way of sperm donations within the province and deceptive potential dad and mom concerning the variety of youngsters they’ve fathered.
“The variety of youngsters conceived by way of the defendants’ sperm donations far exceeds advisable limits and poses critical dangers,” Chamberland wrote in his resolution.
“The defendants intend to proceed donating sperm through the proceedings. The interlocutory injunction sought should subsequently be granted.”
The injunction was introduced ahead by a lady who’s the mom of 4 youngsters utilizing sperm from Normand and Seelos.
In line with her, on the time the agreements resulting in the donations had been concluded, the defendants made false representations regarding the variety of youngsters beforehand conceived by way of their sperm donations and undertook to stop donating sperm for third‑occasion parental tasks as soon as sure limits had been reached.
Normand allegedly undertook to restrict his donations to a most of 10 households, besides to finish households already begun, and Seelos to a most of 25 youngsters, additionally besides to finish households already begun.
Get breaking Nationwide information
Get breaking Canada information delivered to your inbox because it occurs so you will not miss a trending story.
These guarantees had been decisive within the lady’s resolution to make use of their reproductive materials, the judgment reads.
The kids had been conceived between 2009 and 2012, and in 2022 or 2023, she realized Normand is the organic father of Seelos, which she claims the defendants knowingly hid from her. She additionally suspected they could have lied to her concerning the variety of youngsters ensuing from their sperm donations.
She then started speaking with different ladies who had used their providers to learn the way many youngsters they could have fathered. On Nov. 6, 2024, she counted 162 youngsters or ongoing pregnancies ensuing from Normand’s sperm donations and 451 youngsters or ongoing pregnancies ensuing from Seelos’s sperm donations.
She filed her unique utility – an order completely prohibiting the defendants from offering their sperm to any individual wishing to resort to procreation involving a 3rd‑occasion contribution – two days later.
The defendants contested the applying, saying that whereas they acknowledge the variety of youngsters they fathered vastly exceeds the contractual limits claimed, they deny having undertaken such obligations towards her. The defendants additionally admitted they haven’t any intention of ceasing their donations, the judgment famous.
With the interlocutory injunction now in place, Normand and Seelos can’t donate sperm in Quebec till a last judgment is rendered.
Normand, who represented himself, advised International Information he was “shocked and unhappy” on the ruling.
He claimed the girl is making up what number of youngsters they’ve fathered.
“For now, I’m shutting down in Quebec, and ultimately, what is going to I do? I’m pondering of my choices,” Normand stated when requested if he would transfer elsewhere in Canada to donate sperm.
Jessica Lelièvre, the girl’s lawyer, disputed what Normand stated, including that fathering a whole bunch of kids comes with penalties.
“For those who assume of a kid, an adolescent who’s beginning to be fascinated with intimate relationships and is aware of that they’ve a whole bunch of half-brothers and half-sisters on the market, what does that imply for a kid making an attempt to develop in relationships, in intimacy?” she stated.
“This [the ruling] is a short lived reduction; we’re nonetheless going to wish a trial on the benefit of that case and through that trial, we intend to point out the total image of these penalties for our consumer, her youngsters and what it means for the longer term.”
© 2026 International Information, a division of Corus Leisure Inc.