A problem of Quebec’s secularism legislation, often called Invoice 21, shall be heard on the Supreme Courtroom of Canada starting Monday, with the however clause on the coronary heart of arguments.
The case stems from a legislation handed in June 2019 by the Quebec authorities led by François Legault, which bans sure public-sector employees — together with lecturers, law enforcement officials and judges — from carrying spiritual symbols on the job within the title of state neutrality.
Get day by day Nationwide information
Get day by day Canada information delivered to your inbox so you may by no means miss the day’s prime tales.
The Coalition Avenir Québec authorities pre-emptively invoked the however clause of the Canadian Constitution of Rights and Freedoms to defend the legislation from most court docket challenges over basic rights violations.
Authorized specialists say the arguments will centre on the factors for suspending rights greater than on state secularism.
Quebec Superior Courtroom and the Quebec Courtroom of Attraction have principally sided with the provincial authorities in its rulings, whereas additionally criticizing how the federal government has employed the however clause.
Teams together with the Nationwide Council of Canadian Muslims, the Canadian Civil Liberties Affiliation and the World Sikh Group will meet with reporters right now forward of the hearings, that are anticipated to run 4 days.
© 2026 The Canadian Press